future proofing is good, but...

since print() was made a function in py3, i can predict at some point
that return will be made a func as well. sure, good.
but "return()" *currently* returns an empty tuple. We want to
explicitly return None for testing purposes.
This commit is contained in:
2019-12-11 04:33:15 -05:00
parent a1bc613979
commit d7d85c7d9d
24 changed files with 156 additions and 156 deletions

View File

@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ class Connection(_common.BaseConnection):
# Weird hack because netctl doesn't natively support assigning add'l addrs to a dhcp/dhcp6/slaac iface.
if 'IPCustom' in self._cfg['BASE'].keys() and isinstance(self._cfg['BASE']['IPCustom'], list):
self._cfg['BASE']['IPCustom'] = '({0})'.format(' '.join(self._cfg['BASE']['IPCustom']))
return()
return(None)
def writeConf(self, chroot_base):
systemd_base = os.path.join(chroot_base, 'etc', 'systemd', 'system')
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ class Connection(_common.BaseConnection):
fh.write(line)
os.chmod(netctl_file, 0o0600)
os.chown(netctl_file, 0, 0)
return()
return(None)
class Ethernet(Connection):
@@ -300,4 +300,4 @@ class Wireless(Connection):
# if crypto['type'] in ('wep', 'wpa', 'wpa2', 'wpa3'):
if crypto['type'] in ('wpa', 'wpa2'):
self._cfg['BASE']['Key'] = crypto['auth']['psk']
return()
return(None)